Source 2 - letter from the Taoiseach Mr. Bertie Ahern

A letter from the Taoiseach Bertie Ahern to the UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, 10 June 1998

Context notes

One of many controversial issues in the history of Northern Ireland was the system of policing. Many in the Nationalist community felt that the existing police force, the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) did not represent them properly. As part of the Agreement, the RUC was to be replaced by a new force called the Police Service of Northern Ireland. An Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland was set up to study policing and make recommendations about how Northern Ireland was to be policed in the future. There was a great deal of heated debate about who should be appointed to be part of this Commission. The situation was not helped when a confidential document about the Commission was leaked to the press on 4 June 1998 and revealed how tense and angry the debate was over the Commission.

Transcript

Oifig an Taoisigh

Office of the Taoiseach

 

10 June, 1998

 

The Right Honourable Tony Blair, M.P.,

Prime Minister,

10 Downing Street,

London.

 

Dear Tony,

I am writing to express my serious concern at the decisions taken on the Policing Commission and the Prisons Bill and in particular at the manner in which those decisions were taken.

Coupled with the leak of the Secretary of State’s conversations about the Policing Commission they have created a real sense of alarm amongst Nationalists that some people in the system are attempting to claw back parts of the Good Friday Agreement with which they do not agree.

At this stage my principal concern is not to go over the past but to ensure that future decisions concerning the Agreement are reached after open discussion between us which reach a clear and agreed understanding of what each side will do. We can draw lessons from the Police Commission which caused unnecessary problems between us, damaged confidence in the balanced implementation of the Agreement and inflicted unnecessary discomfort on those who were willing to accept membership. All this could have been avoided had we sat down at an early stage, discussed possible names and reached agreement on the membership.

Likewise an early discussion of the Prisons Bill would have allowed me to put at that stage my strong view that the approach adopted in the Bill, of redefining what constitutes a ceasefire and of seeking to specify terrorist organisations may be storing up real problems.

2

I understand that your system is considering a number of early announcements post the 25 June Assembly Election. It is clear also that the parades issue and the formation of the Shadow Executive in Northern Ireland will be contentious. I would ask that you and the Secretary of State send a clear message to all relevant parts of your system, as I and David Andrews will be happy to do in our case, that any such decisions follow on open consultation between our systems. This message should make clear that adequate time be allowed for realistic consideration and decision at the political level between the two of us if that is required.

I trust you will appreciate my concern that we act in every way together to maximise the positive and minimise the contentious in the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement and that we preserve the Agreement’s essential balance. I know from your work in reaching the Agreement that that is very much your personal approach and wish. I believe that we both, with David Andrews and Mo Mowlam, need to make absolutely clear to our respective systems that we will not be diverted from that purpose.

Yours sincerely,

Bertie Ahern, T.D., Taoiseach

« Return to The Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement (KS4)

Questions

Content

  1. What is Ahern concerned about?
  2. According to Ahern, why are Nationalists alarmed?

Inferences from the Content

  1. Would historians be able to infer that Ahern is more concerned about not being consulted than about the actual decisions which have been made? Explain your answer.

Inferences from the Context

  1. Is this source evidence that relations between the UK, Ireland and groups and politicians in Northern Ireland have broken down? Explain your answer.

Lines of Argument

Which line(s) of argument A-E could use this document as supporting evidence?