Katherine Malpas: Answers of Thomas Saunders. (Catalogue ref: STAC 8/32/13)
In the course of a legal trial witnesses would be called to answer Interrogatories (questions) about the case. This source contains three of the answers of Thomas Saunders who denied pretending that Katherine Malpas (the younger) was a witch for his own financial gain, February, 1622.
Transcript
- Thomas Saunders of Upton in the parish of WestHam
- in the county of Essex yeoman sworn &c
- To the first Interrogatory [question] this defendant says that he did not in or
- about the month of December in the 18 year of his Majesty’s reign
- persuade, procure or invite Katherine Malpas the younger
- in this interrogatory mentioned to counterfeit [pretend] or fain herself to
- be bewitched & possessed with an evil spirit or to
- counterfeit or fain strange fits or trances or to practise
- & use strange & unusual tricks of deceits as it is in this
- interrogatory set forth. Neither doth he know of any other person or persons
- that did move or incite her thereunto or were privy
- acquainted or consenting to the same & doth utterly deny
- that he did teach or instruct her the said K.M. [Katherine Malpas] at any time
- or showed unto her the manner how to do or perform the same
- in this interrogatory questioned. Neither doth he know or hath heard
- of any other person or persons that did instruct her therein nor
- show her any such form & to the rest
- of this interrogatory this defendant denies the particulars therein
- To the 2 Interrogatory this defendant say he did report to diverse
- of his friends & acquaintances that the said K.M. was strangely
- visited but denies that he or any other person or persons did
- devise or use any means how to draw company out the
- house of this defendant where the said K.M. did then remain to
- see the strange & unusual fits & trances used by the
- said K.M. but whether the said K.M. did counterfeit the
- same this defendant knows not.
- To the 3 interrogatory this defendant says he did not nor any other
- person or persons to this knowledge that moved or persuaded the
- said K.M. the younger to counterfeit as aforesaid or to draw
- company to see her strange tricks & fits, neither was
- it conceived by this defendant or any others that much money would
- be given unto this defendant or the said K.M. by any person or persons
- that should come to see her in pity or commiseration but confesses
- & says that 4d was given unto this defendant by a stranger unknown to the use of
- the said K.M. which was all that this defendant ever received in that
- kind in this interrogatory demanded. And says that some other means
- was given unto K.M. the elder but how much or from whom
- she so received it this defendant knows not.