Through the Information Management Report (IMR), The National Archives drives compliance with the Public Records Act (PRA) and Section 46 Code of Practice and monitors the transition to the 20-year rule. On an annual basis, we ask bodies that transfer records to The National Archives to provide data on volume and transfer status of the records they hold. We are currently publishing the data collected in early 2018. This data reflects the position as it was at the end of the calendar year 2017.
By publishing this data here, we enable comparison with data submitted in 2017 (reflecting the position as it was at the end of the calendar year 2016) and in the previous Records Transfer Reports (RTR).
The PRA requires central government departments, and certain other public bodies, to identify records of historical value. They will then transfer these records for permanent preservation to The National Archives, or to another appointed place of deposit, by the time they are 30 years old. The Government is reducing this timeframe from 30 to 20 years through the transition to a 20-year-rule taking place over ten years. The transitional arrangements were introduced in 2013. They envisaged public records bodies transferring two years’ worth of records each year until 2022. From 2023 onwards, public bodies will be due to transfer one year’s worth of records each year, as they become 20 years old.
Accessing the Information Management Report 2018
The National Archives asks for input to the IMR annually in the first quarter of each calendar year. We publish the results on our website and some public records bodies have published more detailed plans through their own online channels.
The transition to the 20-year rule aims to enable public records bodies to adapt to the requirement to process their records after 20 years by 2023. We have just passed the halfway point in this timetable.
The figures presented in the IMR will fluctuate throughout the transition period. This results from review and potentially inheritance of records (as part of Machinery of Government Changes). Furthermore, public bodies develop a better understanding of their holdings as they plan and deliver their responses each year.
Legacy and current figures
The IMR allows a year-by-year comparison of the public record bodies that transfer records to The National Archives and their progress towards the 20-year rule. These bodies provide data on the volume of records they hold in the following categories:
- Legacy – records due for transfer or disposal now beyond their PRA due date (i.e. records up to and including 1992)
- Current – records due for transfer or disposal in 2018 (i.e. records from 1993 and 1994).
An overview table presents the information for all bodies that submitted an IMR for each year (see downloads below). It is sorted A-Z by the name of the public record body.
IMR 2018 (XLS, 371KB)
IMR 2018 (CSV, 152KB)
In addition, the graphs below summarise the data to show the overall numbers as well as a breakdown for each of the Ministerial Departments. These departments account for 90% of the records transferred to The National Archives each year. The graphs compare the snapshot of the data for 2017 gathered in 2018 with the data gathered during the previous years.
Public records bodies may retain records past their due date. This requires coverage by a Retention Instrument approved by the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. For independent advice on questions relating to access to public records the Secretary of State refers to the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives. The grounds on which such retention may be approved are set out here.
The IMR presents the figures provided in two groups. The first group relates to records covered by a Retention Instrument (and thereby compliant with the PRA). The second group are records not covered by a Retention Instrument (and thereby not compliant with the PRA). Public bodies can submit applications for retention throughout the year. These applications are considered quarterly at the meetings of the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives. Therefore compliance figures from the IMR are subject to change.
The IMR only includes volumes of records due for processing for The National Archives. It does not include records that may be placed in local places of deposit.
History of the Information Management Report
The National Archives started gathering information on records holdings via the Record Transfer Report (RTR) in 2012. Traditionally we gathered data twice a year (spring and autumn). The findings were published on our website as part of our commitment to transparency.
The National Archives identified a need to refocus the RTR in 2016 when reaching the halfway point of the transition to the 20-year rule. Consequently, we compiled data for the first IMR in early 2017. That data is now available here to enable comparison with the data gathered in 2018.
IMR 2017 (XLS, 525KB)
IMR 2017 (CSV, 186KB)
We now ask for input to the IMR in the first quarter of each calendar year and publish the findings on our website.
You can access the data from the RTR 2012 to 2016 via the links below.
Record transfer report Autumn 2016 (XLS, 163 KB)
Record transfer report Autumn 2016 (CSV, 47 KB)
Record transfer report Spring 2016 (XLS, 180 KB)
Record transfer report Spring 2016 (CSV, 53 KB)
Record transfer report Autumn 2015 (XLS, 102 KB)
Record transfer report Autumn 2015 (CSV, 53 KB)
Record transfer report Spring 2015 (XLS, 102 KB)
Record transfer report Spring 2015 (CSV, 53 KB)
Record transfer report Autumn 2014 (XLS, 121 KB)
Record transfer report Autumn 2014 (CSV, 27 KB)
Record transfer report Spring 2014 (XLS, 75 KB)
Record transfer report Spring 2014 (CSV, 21 KB)
2013 Web Archive pages
2012 Web Archive pages
Find out more
- Access a summary of the public records transferred to The National Archives each year
- Read more about the 20-year rule
- Find out how the records transfer process works
- Read about the legislation that shapes how the government record is managed
- Find answers to the most frequently asked questions about the Information Management Report