Funded Records at Risk Grants
Find out more about projects awarded Records at Risk Grants.
Find out more about our Records at Risk Grants, including their purpose, eligibility, conditions and how to apply, and submit your application.
The Records at Risk Grant programme seeks to safeguard at-risk collections for the nation. Its objective is to provide an additional mechanism to protect records of cultural and research value from premature destruction or prolonged neglect. Its focus is on records and services that are not protected by legislation, such as archives of businesses, charities and private individuals.
The Records at Risk Grant programme is open to applications on a rolling basis, with funds available for rapid distribution. Panel meetings are held on a monthly basis.
The programme provides grants of up to £5,000.
The grant is designed to facilitate urgent intervention to save collections, and therefore we will consider applications with any project duration. However, it would be normal for any intervention to be completed within one year from the award of funding.
Find out more about projects awarded Records at Risk Grants.
As part of our commitment to being open and supportive throughout this programme, we want to share that the current success rate for Records at Risk Grant applications is 53%.
Every application brings you into the programme, giving you access to our training opportunities, our wider networks, and the expertise of our team. If you’re thinking about applying, we warmly encourage you to get in touch. Our aim is to support you wherever you are in your journey - whether that’s developing a strong application or finding the right pathway forward.
The Records at Risk Grant programme is open to all eligible archives and heritage organisations in the United Kingdom. We cannot fund organisations based in the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man or whose collections are held outside of the United Kingdom.
The programme is open to all public sector bodies, not-for-profit organisations including registered charities, and for-profit organisations including business archives.
Applicants will need to be a recognised archival custodian. Examples of a recognised custodian include institutional or accredited archive services under the Archives Service Accreditation Scheme, or a member of an appropriate specialist group such as the Community Archives and Heritage Group. However, the applicant organisation does not need to be an Accredited Archive to receive funding; our definition is broader and includes many types of archival organisations.
In exceptional circumstances, the records creator will be able to receive funding; such organisations must apply in partnership with a recognised archival custodian.
Where appropriate, archives are encouraged to propose partnership projects and consortium applications are welcome.
The records themselves must pass the following four eligibility tests:
The records can be in analogue or digital formats and can be inside or outside of the custody of the records creator or a recognised collecting archive institution.
We use the definition of an archive collection as given within the Archive Service Accreditation Scheme:
Materials created or received by a person, family or organisation, public or private, in the conduct of their affairs and preserved because of the enduring value contained in them or as evidence of the functions and responsibilities of their creator, especially those materials maintained using the principles of provenance, original order and collective control; permanent records.
Society of American Archivists
The applicant must employ or have access to professional support from an archivist or similarly qualified professional.
Given the nature and purpose of the funding, we will not accept repeat applications, for the same collection, without the written permission of The National Archives’ Grants and Funding Office. There are no restrictions on institutions submitting an application for a different collection than was previously assessed.
The Records at Risk Grant programme funds interventions of up to £5,000, and all costs should be directly related to the urgent intervention. However, we understand that the nature of risks and solutions are likely to vary based on circumstances, therefore most cost categories are eligible.
The programme cannot fund:
We welcome and encourage applications from people of all backgrounds and are committed to making our application process accessible to everyone. This includes providing support, in the form of reasonable adjustments, for people who have a disability or a long-term condition and face barriers applying to us. You must contact us as early as possible in the application process.
The Records at Risk Grant programme is a rolling fund, open for applications at any point throughout the year. As this fund is designed to support urgent interventions, your application will be reviewed by the Archive Sector Funding team at The National Archives for eligibility and then shared with the funding panel.
Applications will be assessed upon receipt for urgent risk of loss or destruction and prioritised for assessment. Longer term and less urgent interventions will be considered in our monthly panel meetings. Applications for these need to be received two weeks in advance of the panel meeting for consideration. Late applications will be considered at the next month's panel.
We ask that all applications be submitted via our online form. You can download a Word document version of the form to help you prepare.
Records at Risk Grants have a single-stage application process, completed online.
Each application will be scored numerically against a set of criteria, according to the following scale:
| Score | Rating |
|---|---|
| 1 | Poor |
| 2 | Low |
| 3 | Good |
| 4 | Excellent |
| 5 | Outstanding |
Applications are assessed by a panel of archival and heritage experts, selected from within and outside of The National Archives, and including representatives from the British Records Association and the Business Archives Council.
The Records at Risk Grant panel members are:
| Richard Wiltshire | Representative of the Business Archives Council |
| Victoria Northwood | Representative of the British Records Association |
| Philip Gale | Head of Collections and Cultural Property |
| Katerina Williams | Head of Conservation and Treatment Development |
| Natalie Brown | Head of Audiences, Collection Care |
| Sarah Noble | Head of Conservation for Imaging |
| Liz Hart | Senior Adviser (Manorial Records) |
The criteria information provided below is not intended to be exhaustive: an outstanding answer may not cover all of the points mentioned, and/or may cover other points as appropriate to the applicant and their project.
The National Archives is committed to supporting the preservation and use of significant archival collections within the United Kingdom. You should aim to outline why your collection is important, unique and of clear value to your audiences, today and in the future.
Significance may be different for different audiences that engage with a collection, and it may be helpful to consider who they are. An academic may have a different goal, when engaging with a collection, than a family historian or community representative.
The prompts below may help you to think about why and how your collection is significant, but you do not need to cover all of them – you should focus your answer on your collection’s areas of strength:
Please ensure that the focus of your response is on the collection that you are intending to work with. The significance of the wider collections in your archive can be important, but your main focus should be on the collection that you are applying for.
youtube.com
Watch a YouTube video explaining how we consider 'Significance' when scoring grant applications.
Tell us why your project is needed, and why it is needed now.
You might want to tell us about a particular problem or challenge which you are seeking to address. This might be an immediate issue, such as a physical or organisational threat to a collection: what is the collection’s condition, and is it at risk from mould, pests, damage or obsolescence? What is its environment, for physical or digital storage? Is the organisation holding the collection at risk, from closure or liquidation?
You may also want to capitalise on particular opportunities: whether there are local strategies or wider initiatives which make the project timely, or whether there is other funding or partnerships which are immediately available. What will happen if you do not get a grant from us?
It’s important to outline why the grant provides a solution or partial solution to the challenge, and why it is important for the investment to occur now. It may be helpful to include evidence supporting this answer: for example, you could include photographs or supporting letters.
Every archive service will have different needs, both short-term and long-term: use this response to tell us what they are.
youtube.com
Watch a YouTube video explaining how we consider 'Need' when scoring grant applications.
We define impact as “the demonstrable contribution that a project makes.” Tell us why your project is going to change things: for you, for your archive service, for your users and audiences, for the archives sector, or for society. We want to understand what difference your proposal will make, and what change will result from the project, and for whom.
Ask yourself ‘what will happen?’ What are the short-term, medium-term and long-term changes that the project will bring about, and who will be affected? Is the change physical (new resources, materials or capital), procedural, or cultural?
Impact should scale according to the size of the grant being provided: for smaller grants, impact may be personal (new skills or learning), or institutional (such as improved ways of working within your archive service). For larger grants, strong applications will evidence impact beyond their own organisation. Please read the question carefully, to ensure that you are focusing your answer on the relevant areas of focus.
It is also important to consider the impact that your project will have on users of your archive. The users of archives can be diverse, with audiences having different motivations and needs from your service. You are best placed to understand who your audiences are, and who they could be: it might be helpful to explain the change you want to bring about, in how existing users interact with your service and collections, and/or in how you reach new audiences.
You may wish to outline how you intend to engage with audiences outside of your institution: do you have plans or partnerships in place, to engage with (for example) your local community, researchers, schools or higher education?
It is important to consider how the grant will have an impact beyond its own duration, and create a sustainable legacy of change: is this project part of a longer-term strategic plan, and how does it align with other activities or the future direction of the organisation?
Impact can take many different forms, and every project will have a different response: but a strong answer will always clearly outline what outcomes it is seeking to create, and how it plans to engage with beneficiaries and audiences, inside and outside of the archive service which is applying.
youtube.com
Watch a YouTube video explaining how we consider 'Impact' when scoring grant applications.
When giving a grant, we need to be confident that it is possible to deliver every project that we fund, within the organisation and with the team you have available. Use this question to fully explain how you intend to carry out the project’s activities, spend its budget and achieve its delivery milestones.
We would like to understand in detail what you are proposing to do, who will deliver the project and what skills they have. Please tell us who has overall responsibility for the project, and who else is involved. Will you be working with a professional archivist? What types of posts do you need, and how are they paid? (You may wish to refer to the Archives and Records Association (ARA) salary recommendations). Are new staff being hired, or are you using existing staff; if so, how are their existing responsibilities being covered? Are you using volunteers, and how will they be managed and supported?
Please provide a rationale for any non-staff expenditure that you need to deliver your project, and how you plan to procure any resources you need, if you don’t have access to them already.
If your project involves multiple institutions, tell us how the relationship between the partners will be managed and governed, and how work will be divided and structured.
Tell us how you are going to manage your project, to ensure that it keeps on track – you may wish to attach a Gantt Chart or similar project planning tool, particularly for larger projects. In most grant programmes, we will ask you to outline at least three key milestones that need to be achieved to ensure your project’s success.
Finally, you may want to think about the risks that your project faces, and what mitigations you will be putting in place to address them.
youtube.com
Watch a YouTube video explaining how we consider 'Delivery and management' when scoring grant applications.
The panel will score against the assessment criteria and provide feedback upon request. You will be given the opportunity to discuss your application with a member of The National Archives’ Grants and Funding team.
The National Archives’ decision regarding any application is final, and no appeal process is in place: it is the lead applicant’s responsibility to make sure that all of the information provided in the application is correct, their proposal meets the eligibility criteria, and all sections of the application are complete. Applications that are deemed ineligible will be excluded from consideration. Any points you wish to make should be made clearly and concisely in the application form.
The fund is designed to support urgent interventions, therefore if your application is unsuccessful, it will be unlikely to receive funding from any reapplication. However, the panel will endeavour to provide constructive feedback that enables positive solutions and clear next steps when requested. There are no restrictions on institutions submitting an application for a different project.
If you are awarded funding, The National Archives’ Grants and Funding team will contact you with a Grant Funding Agreement, which should be signed by an appropriate member of your organisation. For grants of a value lower then £20,000, 100% of the grant’s value will be paid to you up front, except in circumstances where The National Archives, in consultation with the grantee, deems that an alternative payment structure is necessary for the successful delivery of the funded activities. For grants of and over £20,000 in value, payments will usually be made in two instalments, at the start and end of your projects.
All grantees will be required to comply with the Code of Conduct for Recipients of Government General Grants and all relevant legislation, as well as the monitoring and evaluation conditions outlined in previous sections. Further conditions may be outlined within the Grant Funding Agreement.
Every applicant will be required to provide a project budget at application stage, using the costing template provided. Successful applicants must also provide a final project expenditure statement, based on actual expenditure. If final expenditure falls below the amount agreed in the Grant Funding Agreement, The National Archives may ask grantees to return any unspent funds at the end of the project. The National Archives will not cover the cost of any project spend above what has been agreed in the Grant Funding Agreement.
Alongside the final expenditure statement, all grantees will also be required to provide an end-of-project report, summarising key achievements against the activities outlined in the application. Some grantees may also be required to provide progress updates throughout the delivery of the project; this will be decided by on case-by-case basis at award stage, based on the complexity of the project proposed. All reporting requirements, including the timing and nature of reporting, will be made clear to successful applicants at award stage.
All grantees will be expected to take steps to address delivery issues or delays if they arise, and inform The National Archives as soon as possible, should an issue arise that poses a significant risk to the successful delivery of the funded activities within the agreed timescales. It is possible that The National Archives’ team may visit your project, during or after your grant (we will not visit applicants as part of the assessment process).
Grantees will also be required to demonstrate the benefits and key performance indicators (KPIs) that the competition is seeking to realise. Successful applicants will be required to provide evidence against these measures. The measures against which applicants will be required to report, and the reporting intervals, will be agreed at award stage. Whilst benefit and KPI reporting is compulsory for all applicants, performance against these indicators is for the purpose of measuring the impact of the funding programme only, and does not affect eligibility for the grant.
Our approach to monitoring and evaluation is informed by our vision: through our grant-making, we want to build evidence for investment in archives, celebrate grantees’ success, and advocate for the archives sector, while keeping our reporting requirements as flexible and accessible as possible.
Should you have any questions about applying for a Records at Risk Grant, including about eligibility and reasonable adjustments, please contact the Grants and Funding team via email.