What kind of ruler was Oliver Cromwell?
Case study 2: Cromwell in the eyes of others – Source 5

A summary of Cromwell’s character by a royalist
(Earl of Clarendon, Edward Hyde: The History of the Great Rebellion, Vol. III, part 1, p.432, p.509. Published at Clarendon Printing House, 1767-1786)
5a.
To listen to this podcast, you will require
Adobe Flash 9 or higher and must have
Javascript enabled.
What is this source?
These are two extracts from ‘The History of the Great Rebellion’ by the Earl of Clarendon, Edward Hyde (1609-1674).
More
His writings, published in the early 1700s, have proved to be a very useful source for historians.
Top of page
What's the background to this source?
Working out the viewpoint of this source is an interesting challenge for an historian. The writer had no reason to like Cromwell, but may also have had reason to dislike the royal family.
More
- The Earl started out as a country gentleman.
- He became an MP in 1640.
- At first he was a strong critic of Charles I.
- However, when war broke out he joined the Royalist side. During the Civil War he stayed with the king in Oxford. He became very close to Charles I.
- He continued to support the Royalist cause after Charles was executed. He lived in exile with Charles’s son.
- In 1660, when this son became Charles II, Hyde was rewarded for his loyalty. Charles II made him Earl of Clarendon.
- However, in 1667 he fell out of favour with Charles II for criticising the king’s personal lifestyle. He then went into exile.
Top of page
It's worth knowing that...
Machiavelli was an Italian political writer. He wrote a book called ‘The Prince’, which explained how rulers stayed in power.
More
He recommended that rulers should use every possible way to destroy their enemies. Even today we describe someone who uses cunning and dirty tricks as being Machiavellian.
Top of page
Your turn: What can we learn from this source?
- According to source 5a, what were people’s attitudes towards Cromwell?
- Does source 5b tell us anything about Cromwell’s bad qualities?
- Does source 5b tell us anything about Cromwell’s good qualities?
- Why might an enemy of Cromwell have written about Cromwell’s good points?
- What overall impression does this source give of Cromwell?
Top of page