    |
|
|

The cup final
In April 1901, Hotspur FC
(later Tottenham Hotspur), then a club of the Southern League,
beat Sheffield United of division one by 3-1 in the cup final,
after a replay at Burden Park, Bolton. The first game, a 2-2
draw at Crystal Palace, saw the first six-figure attendance
for a football match - 114, 815 spectators.
|
 |
The first video replay?
On the Monday after the replay, the 'Spurs' (Hotspur
FC) showed animated pictures of both games to the accompaniment
of the Tottenham Brass Band. The pictures proved conclusively
that the referee had been wrong to award Sheffield their second
goal in the first match, a decision that was to haunt him for
the rest of his career. The advertisement for the event declared:
'If the Spurs win the cup a grand display of fireworks will
conclude the entertainment', introducing the possibility (well
known to the watchers of football highlights ever since) that
the result in the pictures might be different from the one on
the pitch. |
Too much football?
The cup final attracted the censure of the church: the
Bishop of Wakefield spoke of football watching as 'idolatry'.
Henry Leach, writing in George R. Sims' Living London,
commented:
Nowhere is there such enthusiasm as at Tottenham, where the
bands play and the spectators roar themselves hoarse when goals
are scored, and betake themselves in some numbers to the football
hostelries when all is over to fight the battle once again.
It is a football fever of severe form which is abroad at Tottenham. |
Watch the crowds at a football
match. |
Table tennis
While football seemed to be developing into an unhealthy
obsession, the new game of table tennis was identified as a
passing fad. The Times correspondent reported the popularity
of the new sport of ding-dong, ping-pong or table tennis, whose
first championships were held in December 1901. He was plainly
irritated by the prospect of having to watch hours of the new
sport: |
 |
|
'The ping-pong of the diminutive parchment or vellum rackets
was heard incessantly all afternoon.' Although he was impressed
by a 13 year old boy, who came third with 'cat-like
agility',
his final verdict was damning: 'One is inclined to think that
a game at which a child can compete on equal terms with grown
men cannot make much of a claim to be considered anything
but an occupation for the idlest, slackest hours'.
|
| |
|
|
|
|