An 18th Century Voyage of Discovery
|
| |
Questions and Evidence
Many questions arise out of this voyage, which the sources used as evidence
may help to answer:
- Was the intention of the voyage to harass the enemies of the Crown?
View the sources
- Was the intention of the voyage to gain a profit for the Crown?
View the sources
- Was the intention of the voyage to gain a profit for the merchants
who backed the voyage?
View the sources
- Was there any difference between privateering and piracy?
View the sources
- Was Alexander Selkirk, the inspiration for Robinson Crusoe, involved
in the capture and sale of slaves?
View the sources
- Was Woodes Rogers involved in slave trading?
View the sources
- Were captured slaves brought back to England and sold?
View the sources
- Was Thomas Goldney II, the principal shareholder in Woodes Rogers’
voyage, guilty of making profits out of plunder and slave trading?
View the sources
- Was the expansion of Coalbrookdale ironworks in Shropshire partially
funded through the profits made by Woodes Rogers’ voyage?
View the sources
- Can it be argued that the Industrial Revolution was partially built
on the profits of slavery?
View the sources
- Is there any evidence to link Goldney Hall to the Slave Trade?
View the sources
- Is there any evidence to link the Iron Bridge in Shropshire to the
Slave Trade?
View the sources
- Is there any evidence that reveals the existence of a Black and Asian
Presence in Bristol before 1850?
View the sources
back to main page |
|
| |
1. Was the intention of the voyage to
harass the enemies of the Crown?

Document
| Transcript |
Letters of marque and reprisal for the Duke and Dutchess.
Letters of marque and reprisal were obtained from the Lord High Admiral.
These letters enabled merchant ships to be armed for self-defence
from foreign ships but also sanctioned attacks on foreign ships, especially
those deemed enemies of Britain. In reality, privateering was little
more than high seas piracy and the booty collected was another way
of making money when ‘normal’ maritime trade was suspended,
such as in time of war.
Monies were also paid as customs duties to the Crown on the ship’s
return, the captured ships being condemned in Admiralty courts and
confiscated. |
back to questions
|
|
2. Was the intention of the voyage to gain a profit
for the Crown?

Document
| Transcript |
Letters of marque and reprisal for the Duke and Dutchess.
Letters of marque and reprisal were obtained from the Lord High Admiral.
These letters enabled merchant ships to be armed for self-defence
from foreign ships but also sanctioned attacks on foreign ships, especially
those deemed enemies of Britain. In reality, privateering was little
more than high seas piracy and the booty collected was another way
of making money when ‘normal’ maritime trade was suspended,
such as in time of war.
Monies were also paid as customs duties to the Crown on the ship’s
return, the captured ships being condemned in Admiralty courts and
confiscated. |
back to questions |
| |
3. Was the intention of the voyage to
gain a profit for the merchants who backed the voyage?

Document
| Transcript |
Payments made by Thomas Goldney II for the Duke and Dutchess.
|

Document
| Transcript |
Documents showing the shares owned by, and payments made to, the
Bristol merchant backers including Thomas Goldney II. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
4. Was there any difference
between privateering and piracy?

Document
| Transcript |
Letters of marque and reprisal for the Cinque Ports galley.
|

Document
| Transcript |
Letters of marque and reprisal for the St George. |

Document
| Transcript |
Letters of marque and reprisal for the Duke and Dutchess.
|
Letters of marque and reprisal were obtained from the
Lord High Admiral. These letters enabled merchant ships to be armed
for self-defence from foreign ships but also sanctioned attacks on
foreign ships, especially those deemed enemies of Britain. In reality,
privateering was little more than high seas piracy and the booty collected
was another way of making money when ‘normal’ maritime
trade was suspended, such as in time of war.
Monies were also paid as customs duties to the crown on the ship’s
return, the captured ships being condemned in Admiralty courts and
confiscated. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
5. Was Alexander Selkirk, the inspiration
for Robinson Crusoe, involved in the capture and sale of slaves?

Document
| Transcript |
This deposition made by Alexander Selkirk in a court case against
William Dampier does not mention his own activities apart from his
role as master on the voyage in 1703. |

Document
|
This source shows that the crews of the Duke and Dutchess
were involved in raiding towns for plunder. |

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that the crews of the Duke and Dutchess
were involved in the capture of ‘Negro’ slaves. |

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that the crews of the Duke and Dutchess
were involved in the capture of ‘Negro’ slaves. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
6. Was Woodes Rogers involved in slave
trading?

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that the crews of the Duke and Dutchess
were involved in the capture of ‘Negro’ slaves.
|

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that the crews of the Duke and Dutchess
were involved in the capture of ‘Negro’ slaves. |

Document
| Transcript |
This source suggests that slaves captured on the voyage were brought
to England. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
7. Were captured slaves brought back
to England and sold?

Document
| Transcript |
This source suggests that slaves captured on the voyage were brought
to England. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
8. Was Thomas Goldney II, the principal
shareholder in Woodes Rogers’s voyage, guilty of making profits
out of plunder and slave trading?

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that Thomas Goldney II was the principal shareholder
in the voyage of Woodes Rogers and therefore made the most profit
out of it. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
9. Was the expansion of Coalbrookdale ironworks in Shropshire
partially funded through the profits made by Woodes Rogers’ voyage?

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that Thomas Goldney II was the principal shareholder
in the voyage of Woodes Rogers and therefore made the most profit
out of it. |

Document
| Transcript |
This shows that £1,700 was paid by Thomas Goldney II to fund
the expansion of the Coalbrookdale ironworks in Shropshire. This was
two years after the return of the Woodes Rogers voyage and after most
of the plunder had been sold. |
back to questions
|
|
10. Can it be argued that the Industrial Revolution
was partially built on the profits of slavery?

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that Thomas Goldney II was the principal shareholder
in the voyage of Woodes Rogers and therefore made the most profit
out of it. |

Document
| Transcript |
This shows that £1,700 was paid by Thomas Goldney II to fund
the expansion of the Coalbrookdale ironworks in Shropshire. This was
two years after the return of the Woodes Rogers voyage and after most
of the plunder had been sold. |
back to questions |
| |
11. Is there any evidence to link Goldney
Hall to the Slave Trade?

Document
| Transcript |
The will of Thomas Goldney II shows that he left his country house
to Thomas Goldney III, who greatly expanded the house, gardens and
grounds.
|

Document
| Transcript |
This source shows that Thomas Goldney II was the principal shareholder
in the voyage of Woodes Rogers and therefore made the most profit
out of it. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
12. Is there any evidence to link the
Iron Bridge in Shropshire to the Slave Trade?

Document
| Transcript |
This shows that £1,700 was paid by Thomas Goldney II to fund
the expansion of the Coalbrookdale ironworks in Shropshire. This was
two years after the return of the Woodes Rogers voyage and after most
of the plunder had been sold. The Iron Bridge, built 70 years later,
was conceived by Abraham Darby III’s Coalbrookdale Company,
which expanded after the partnership with the Goldney family. |
back to questions
|
|
| |
13. Is there any evidence that reveals
the existence of a Black and Asian Presence in Bristol before 1850?

Document
| Transcript |
This source suggests that slaves captured on the voyage were brought
to England.
|

Document
| Transcript |
This source suggests that Black people who lived in Bristol at the
time of Woodes Rogers’ voyage or who were crew made a small
profit out of the voyage. |
back to questions
|
|