I TOLD the German Ambassador to-day that the reply of the German Government with regard to the neutrality of Belgium was a matter of very great regret,
because the neutrality of Belgium affected feeling in this country. If Germany could
see her way to give the same assurance as that which had been given by France it
would materially contribute to relieve anxiety and tension here. On the other hand, if
there were a violation of the neutrality of Belgium by one combatant while the other
respected it, it would be extremely difficult to restrain public feeling in this country. I said that we had been discussing this question at a Cabinet meeting, and, as I was
authorised to tell him this, I gave him an aide-mémoire of it.
He asked me whether, if Germany gave a promise not to violate Belgian neutrality,
we would engage to remain neutral.
I replied that I could not say that; our hands were still free, and we were considering what our attitude should be. All I could say was that our attitude would be
determined largely by public opinion here and that the neutrality of Belgium would
appeal very strongly to public opinion here. I did not think that we could give a
promise of neutrality on that condition alone.
The Ambassador pressed me as to whether I could not formulate conditions on
which we would remain neutral. He even suggested that the integrity of France and
her colonies might be guaranteed.
I said that I felt obliged to refuse definitely any promise to remain neutral on
similar terms, and I could only say that we must keep our hands free.