The Cabinet Papers banner

1974 Cabinet conclusion on Industrial Relations Act repeal

Cabinet Conclusion 21 March 1974. Repeal of the Industrial Relations Act
Cabinet Conclusion 21 March 1974. Repeal of the Industrial Relations Act
CAB 128/54       CC 5 (74) 6

Open the original document

By the later 1960s the political consensus of earlier times was breaking down. At the same time, and partly as a cause of this, Britain's economy was experiencing difficulties and working practices in British industries were changing. In many cases unions resisted new working methods. Sometimes workers resisted them against the advice of their unions.

In 1970 a new Conservative government was elected under Edward Heath. He was determined to try and tackle the power of the unions, and succeeded with the Industrial Relations Act of 1971.

Questions to consider

  1. What was the government proposing to do in this extract?
  2. Do you get the impression that the government was completely happy with the proposed action?
  3. The government at this time was a Labour government. Does that surprise you?
  4. The government did go ahead and repeal the Act. Can we infer anything from this about the power of the trade unions in 1974?

Transcript

REPEAL OF THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT

6. The Cabinet had before them a memorandum by the Secretary of State for Employment (C(74) 11) on the repeal of the Industrial Relations Act.

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EMPLOYMENT said that it was of paramount importance to put the proposals in his memorandum to the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) on 22 March. They did not at any point go beyond what had been agreed between the Labour Party and the TUC. He had discussed the provision for picketing with the Home Secretary and he had discussed with the Lord Chancellor the transitional arrangements for disposing of the remaining cases before the National Industrial Relations Court. He had altered his proposals in the light of their comments and was prepared to consult further with Ministers who had raised points on his paper. He had already had to postpone the submission of his proposals to the TUC and the CBI and a further postponement would be difficult to explain. He hoped that he might have authority to send them his proposals immediately.

In discussion it was argued that both the transitional provisions and the provisions for picketing raised important problems that had not yet been resolved between Ministers. The provisions for picketing in particular ought not to be decided without discussion in Cabinet, for which there was no time at that meeting.

THE PRIME MINISTER, summing up the discussion, said that the Cabinet did not have time for a full discussion of these issues at their present meeting. On the other hand the Government had suffered in 1969 through entering into discussions with the TUC without adequate discussion in Cabinet. Furthermore there was always a risk that proposals put to the TUC would not remain secret. There was urgency in this case and he would therefore hold a meeting later that day with the Secretary of State for Employment, the Lord Chancellor, the Attorney General, the Lord Advocate, and the Secretaries of State for the Home Department, the Environment and Social Services. The group would give authority to the Secretary of State to send the proposals to the TUC and the CBI and would report their conclusions to the full Cabinet on 25 March.

The Cabinet -

Took note with approval of the summing up of their discussion by the Prime Minister.

Original document