Catalogue description Hastings County Borough Council: plans submitted for approval under buildings regulations by-laws

This record is held by East Sussex and Brighton and Hove Record Office (ESBHRO)

Details of dhca/DH/C/6
Reference: dhca/DH/C/6
Title: Hastings County Borough Council: plans submitted for approval under buildings regulations by-laws
Description:

This series consists of plans submitted to Hastings Corporation acting as the Local Board of Health and Urban Sanitary Authority and, from 1888, to Hastings County Borough Council for permission to build new streets and buildings. Plans for St Leonards are not included until it was absorbed into the Hastings Urban Sanitary Authority in 1872. The contents of the series are listed separately on A2A

Date: 1851-1948
Related material:

Plans of areas which lay outside the Borough Boundary before 1897 or the further extension of the Borough in 1936 may be in the series for Battle Rural Sanitary Authority/Rural District Council or Hastings Rural Sanitary Authority/Rural District Council (DH/C 10-12). There is also a small series of drainage plans submitted but not laid before Council (DH/C 28).

Held by: East Sussex and Brighton and Hove Record Office (ESBHRO), not available at The National Archives
Former reference in its original department: DH/C 6
Language: English
Unpublished finding aids:

For indexes, 1851-1948 see DH/C 5

Administrative / biographical background:

When an application, with a plan, was submitted to the Surveyor's Office (or its successor), it was assigned a serial number which was marked on the file and entered in the register (DH/C 9). The outcome of the Council's consideration of the application was added to the register. In the early 1950s, the department created a card index to the applications, probably based on the buildings as they appeared in valuation lists or rate books (DH/C 5/1). The pre-printed cards have a header line for the street name and building name or number. Rows beneath have boxes for application number, nature of application, date and decision. A major exercise was undertaken to match plans, then already up to a century old, to the standing buildings. Early plans and register entries were imprecise; in the nature of applications for new building, sites often had not been assigned street names and numbers; and some street names and numbering changed subsequently. Notes appear on the registers and the files of the clerks' identifications. Unfortunately these serial numbers were not given in the minutes and reports of the committee which considered each application, the Roads Committee and its successors (DH/B 24), though these lists may in some circumstances be helpful in locating a file, as at some periods they include the name of the applicant and/or agent. In the late 1990s, the card index was keyed by Hastings Museum volunteers into an Excel spreadsheet, used as if it was a sheet of paper with tab stops. Each line did not constitute a 'record', as information was not carried down from the header line to each of the applications below. In 2003/4 Record Office staff used this spreadsheet as the basis of a list in serial number order. This process entailed considerable manipulation, first to turn each row into a 'record' - of which there were some 33,000 - then to sort these into serial-number order, then to conflate multiple entries to one file (e.g. for the layout of a new road and for each of the first 10 houses in the road). Numerous discrepancies were resolved and gaps filled by reference to the cards, the registers and the plans, for example where the serial number and the date were incompatible. Since the purpose of the card index was to trace the development of what was standing, not all applications were taken into it, for example those for temporary structures which were no longer standing. In one case where there is an unresolved duplication of plan number, DH/C 6/1/2650, one plan has the suffix x. There are 66 records in DH/C 6/2 which are titled 'Plan number not in index', as no plans under those numbers have been transferred and as details have not yet been retrieved from other sources. The resulting catalogue therefore reflects street names and numbering as they were in the early 1950s. It has not been checked back against the register or the plans. Errors may remain: from initial entry into the registers, from the clerks' transcription and identifications in the 1950s, from the volunteers' transcription in the 1990s and from the Record Office's semi-automated editing of the spreadsheet. Before the spreadsheet was collapsed into a single record for each file, each record was assigned a running number which has been retained in the CALM database (in the field Custodial History) for the record into which other records were collapsed. Where the catalogue record has been taken from the register or the file, that is so recorded as Custodial History. Disc copies of the spreadsheet in its initial form and at some intermediate stages are kept at the Record Office. A few files are marked as 'missing on transfer', but a greater number are absent. Administrative practice varied over time as to how amended or resubmitted plans were recorded. At first they were given a new number; then they were silently added to the original file, leading to several dates of decision for the same file (the convention for series 1 and 2 is to enter the earliest date as Date and the later date(s) under Description, and for series 3 to put first and last dates under Date); finally letters, A, B, etc. were assigned, leading to additional files, though in practice these plans may be in the same envelope as the original one. The date given here is usually the date on which the application was considered by committee. Generally the description of the works to be undertaken has not been edited, so that, for example, where three records, each for a House, have been collapsed into one of them, 'House' has not been changed to '3 houses'.

Have you found an error with this catalogue description?

Help with your research